Click Here to Start Increasing Your Metabolism and Losing Weight


Lipo Dissolve vs Liposuction - Major Differences Between Two Fat Loss Treatments

You may have heard of one of the latest frenzy in plastic surgery called lipo-solubility. This should not be confused with a tried and true fat correction mechanism called liposuction. Although both methods remove unwanted fat in the "problem" areas of the human body, they differ in mechanism, side effects, safety and FDA approval status.

Liposuction comes from a French doctor and became increasingly popular in the eighties and nineties. This procedure can be done in the office of a plastic surgeon and usually does not require hospital stay.

Liposuction patients have their "problem" areas correctly marked, sterilized with Betadine and given local anesthesia or complete anesthesia. Doctors take a small suction device called a cannula and remove unwanted fat in the problem area. The fat is actually separated by the cannula while the patient's vital signs continue to be monitored. This usually involves the absorption of fluid into the area marked by the removal of fat to help relax the fat cells while maintaining the patient's fluid balance during examination. This type of procedure is known as wet or super wet and is more commonly used.

Liposuction is a cosmetic surgery method approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration in the U.S., also known as the FDA. Fat removal procedures are not intended to replace diet and exercise and are limited in the amount of fat released. In general, liposuction does not produce more than five liters of fat per patient. The more fat is released, the more risks involved.

Unlike liposuction, new lipo-solvents are not approved by the FDA. This form of fat removal has been going on for very little time and does not have ongoing clinical trials to prove its safety or long-term effects. In addition, Kansas has sought to pass laws that prevent its doctors from providing PC / DC, standard lipo-solvent treatment. However, the Kansas court barred the law from coming into force while the Kansas State Board of Healing Medicine sought public opinion and held further discussions on the merits and dangers of unapproved therapies.

The business that dissolved Lipo claimed that the procedure was another way of removing fat from the "problem" area. But unlike the invasive liposuction procedure, it involves injections to kill fat cells, or some lipo-soluble ads claim to "dilute the fat." Injections can consist of a variety of ingredients that can kill fat cells, and most doctors urge patients to find out what's in the syringe before they agree to a lipo-solvent injection. The most commonly used formulas for injection are the combination of phosphatidylcholine and deoxycholate sodium (PC / DC). Most of these injections are taken as series that require multiple injections for one area. It's important to note that the FDA has repeatedly issued the statement that "Consumers need to be aware that this is a buyer-be-aware condition. This is an unapproved drug for unapproved uses and we cannot guarantee user safety."

The amount of fat released by injection is smaller than the amount of liposuction procedure but many people find that injection is a good alternative to more aggressive liposuction.

There have been many positive results reported from people who have taken the injection, but concerns remain on its safety. Dr. Michael Olding, Head of Plastic Surgery at George Washington University, said of the Washington Post's lipo-dissolving program, "My problem with the (lipo-dissolve) technique is that its safety and efficacy have not been thoroughly investigated." warn the patient about its use.

Both of these procedures offer individuals the opportunity to lose their fat but no one should consider it a form of weight loss.


No comments